Here's
the update from our second visit to NIH.
Lori
was scanned via CT and PET with contrast while at NIH. This last trip
differs from the first in he number of scans and the different agents
used to highlight the tumors. Put simply, since NIH now has a
baseline for tumor size and location it is much easier to track
without having to put Lori through the full battery of CT / PET/ MRI
scans with 3 different contrasts/ radioactive elements unless
something significant changes are noticed on the first run of scans.
In other words, if the tumors haven't gotten a lot larger or spread
to new locations, there is no need for additional testing. After
getting to NIH on Saturday, Lori had a blood draw Sunday morning and
the 24 hr jug to test for catecholamine levels. Monday was a full
body CT with contrast followed later in the day with a PET scan.
Tuesdays are always clinic day. That is where patients meet with the
individual research fellow that follows their progress. After that we
met with the head of the research protocol Dr. Pacek. He gave us what
I consider to be extremely good news all things considered. Only two
of the six tumors have marginally grown in size. The others appear to
be the same size as the April scans. There also appears to be no new
tumors in any other locations. I was absolutely ecstatic at hearing
this. Dr Pacek indicated the tumors showed to be stable, which he
also confirmed as good news in this situation. During the first
visit to NIH, in addition to the genetic testing of Loris tumor
samples, they also tested for genetic mutations of the succinate
dehydrogenase complex. There are 4 subunits within this complex and a
mutation on any of the 4 can increase the chances of developing a
pheo/ para or other types of tumors depending on the specific
mutation. Some of these mutations can be passed down from generation
to generation, so once a pheo/ para is discovered, genetic testing is
the best way to determine of direct relatives also need to be tested
based on the mutation that may be found. The four subunits where
mutations have been found are known as SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD.
Lori was tested for the last 3 listed and was negative for all
three. That means she did not have any of the most commonly found
mutations known to happen within pheos/ paras. These three subunits
are also known as tumor suppressing genes where as The results of the
testing for the new genetic mutation known to cause the secondary
polycythemia type symptoms listed in earlier posts was also negative.
Dr. Pacek indicated he was unsure if the negative test was due to the
quality of the the tumor tissue sent to NIH from University Hospitals
or not. He did indicate they have different procedures for preserving
tumor tissue samples than other hospitals due to the research
mandate. Since our first visit in April, Dr pacek indicated he had
confirmed two more people with the unnamed genetic mutation and
wanted to retest Lori's DNA and tumor DNA. The age at which Lori
began showing symptoms of the elevated red blood cell counts and
started her entire medical journey, was still in line with the other
four people already confirmed to have this new mutation. This
mutation can be inherited. Dr Pacek indicated there will be more
information available when he publishes a paper on it in an upcoming
New England Journal of Medicine. Like I said before I am overjoyed
by the news that the tumors have not spread or show signs of being
aggressive. The results of the genetic testing most likely will not
be known for some time. We should be going back to NIH toward the end
of October or early November depending on the NIH schedule.
That's
all for now....
So happy to read that you and Lori got good news this trip! I hope everything will only improve as you move forward.
ReplyDelete